The question arose recently in a Continuum
workshop about doing and not doing. A rich discussion ensued, exploring the
relationship between these two and how they can meet.
The Taoist notion of Wu Wei Wu comes to
mind, natural doing without attachment. In Continuum, we do various things and
then observe their effects, like scientific inquiry. It involves keen skills of
observation, but we learn from applying different variables to shift
conditions.
I am reminded of my challenge with
Vipassana meditation some years ago as I became passionate about Continuum. The
Vipassana teachers under S. N. Goenka were extremely strict and rigid about
what could and could not be practiced in addition to Vipassana. As you became a
more “serious meditator,” like I was, attending long courses of 20, 30 or even
more days of silent meditation, you were expected to have Vipassana as the
center of your life. Essentially all other practices were considered
problematic.
I
knew I needed to tell the teachers what I was doing with Continuum, that it was
not strictly a movement exercise but involved awareness and certain states of
consciousness, as well as intention. If I did not tell them, the withholding
would not be right speech. As expected, when I told them, I was asked to make a
choice. If I continued with Continuum, I would not be able to continue sitting
long courses, running a weekly meditation group sitting, or serving the Vipassana
community in any way. They seemed to consider me a bad influence. What was my
crime? I chose life!
Well, that was my interpretation. In
Vipassana, there was talk of getting off the wheel of life. I realized that,
for the first time in my life, I really wanted to live. I wanted to embrace
being in a body fully and to enjoy it. As much as I loved and benefitted from
Vipassana, I knew that my body was suffering from the long hours of sitting and
doing nothing other than observing sensations arising and passing away. It was
becoming stagnant. A short time later, I was diagnosed with a malignant
melanoma, as if to prove the point.
Perhaps, intense meditative practices like
Vipassana are the ultimate for people who have already had the experience of
fully living their lives. Sometimes I wonder if many of us drawn to those
practices are actually unconsciously acting out our dissociative or ambivalent
attachment tendencies. Observing what is can be helpful in coming back into a
body, but I wonder about how useful it is to reject life in favor of the
cushion.
A
Continuum of Embodied Awareness
My choice to continue deepening into
Continuum (and life) was not an ending of my meditation practice. To me, it was
a way to deepen my awareness and bring it more fully into my life. Continuum
involves increasingly subtle awareness, just like Vipassana. It differs in its
feminine flow within the body. My body loves it!
The main issue for the Vipassana teachers
with Continuum was that it involved doing something other than just observing.
In Continuum, we use different kinds of breaths, make sounds into our tissues,
and move our bodies as part of the inquiry into our fluid nature. We do what we
do with as much awareness as possible, sensing the vibrations of the sounds as
they enter our tissues, the tingling of nerve cells awakening, the trickle of motion
and breath into new areas. We sense the places of stuckness, pain, thickness or
heaviness, the places where we hold our bodies up from the support of the earth
under us, and where the weight of our bodies yields into that support.
After our bit of doing, we listen in what
we call Open Attention. We just listen, sense, observe. We may feel energy
moving, a pressure building, blossoming into slow, surprising movement. We may
sense our breath deepening, our tissues softening, spreading, our heart
slowing, opening and warming.
If this is the effect of a little doing, is
it so dangerous?
I have never experienced my heart open as
fully and deeply as I have in Continuum. Even after 30 days of silent
meditation, when I would emerge from the silence in tears, full of tender love
and compassion, it somehow didn’t reach this same dimension.
It seems to me that the essence of
mindfulness meditation is to be able to live mindfully. Meditation is not meant
to be done just on the cushion; we can practice at all times. In Vipassana, we continued
observing the arising and passing away of sensations while walking, eating,
washing, whatever we were engaged in. We were encouraged, however, to reduce
our sensuality and sexuality in life to reduce the chance of attachment. We
practiced with minimal relational interaction, eyes down to the ground, as if
we were alone in a cave somewhere.
I used to love serving courses, which
usually meant working in the kitchen. As servers, we were instructed to speak
only as needed to complete our tasks. I loved being able to apply the benefits
of our meditation to our relational interactions and the challenges that
presented. Isn’t it important to be able to do in our lives, as well as to not
do?
How do we learn this kind of doing?
This is a doing which is also a not doing.
In Continuum, the things we do are usually like gently blowing dust off a leaf.
If we blow too hard, the leaf will be gone along with the dust. To be present
with our doing, we need to be gentle, slow down to avoid being seduced into old
patterns, stay awake to what arises.
Doing
Life, Being Alive
Life involves doing. Our cells are being
but they are also doing every moment. They produce substances, decide what to
receive, and are highly active within and between themselves, making choices
about when and how to interact with other cells in their community. Can we be
like our cells, being with our doing, doing with our being?
When we stop doing, I believe we die.
Something in us dies. We are designed to engage with life. Even sitting and
meditating is a doing. One needs to move the body in such a way as to sit on
the cushion. The meditator must eat at least occasionally. I discovered in
Vipassana that I had the ability to not eat for a few days in a row, an extreme
of not doing. After a few days, my body began to object and deteriorate. I
realized that I needed my body function if I was to continue mediating! I could
perhaps learn to be so equanimous that I could just observe the sensations of
dying, as Goenka describes. In order to be aware of each moment in life, however,
I must engage in living!
What this looks like will differ for each
person, but I am convinced that some degree of doing is essential. If not, how
do we discover our edges? How do we know where we tend to slip off the path
into our habits? Even the most serious of meditators has thoughts arising here
and there. Redirecting the mind when it strays, as is so often instructed in
meditation, is a doing!
The question is, where do we draw the line?
In our modern, western world, there are endless opportunities to do and to lose
awareness. I remember as a graduate student in Somatic Psychology, learning to
sense my pelvic floor. I discovered I could, with practice, write my papers
from my pelvic floor, centering my awareness there. Being on a computer,
however, tends to speed us up and take us away from our body awareness. How
aware of your breath and your sensations are you in this moment as you read
this page?
The internet speeds us up. Mobile phones, WiFi,
internet television … There is no escape! In our modern world, we may not be
able to get away from the over-stimulation, but we can learn to stay fluid,
present and resilient. In my experience, we learn this by practicing deepening
into these states and continuing them into our lives.
The challenge of doing not doing is exaggerated
in Continuum when we begin to interact more fully with gravity. We do odd
things like hang off of chairs and equipment designed for this purpose. As we
engage in fluid fitness, pushing off the floor with hands, feet, or other
random body parts, we are tempted to speed up into more familiar movement
patterns. I have learned so much about presence in life by practicing staying
slow and aware as I combine intentional movement with allowing the spontaneous
to emerge.
But isn’t that like life? Even as babies,
we intentionally reach for a toy and discover a leg spontaneously follows the
reach. Soon we are crawling, challenging our parents to keep up with us.
If we consider the most subtle of doings,
we find we can’t really ever stop. Even in the midst of the deepest stillness,
we continue to breathe. It may be a very subtle, quiet breath, but it is there.
The heart beats, a doing and not doing, from four weeks after conception until
the day we die.
No, I am not ready to stop doing! May I do
with not doing; may I do with awareness. May our awareness widen, our being
deepen, our doing continue on the continuum of life.
Great! Wonderful food for thought, right up my alley. Good Luck to you!
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comment. I'm hope you enjoy digesting!
ReplyDeleteCherriona, Hi! Michael Acutt here. After sitting a three day self-led zen retreat just now in my friend's cottage in Dorset, just two us old zen/recovery friends - l was moved to revisit your beautiful blog on doing/not doing in continuum. I was blessed with such a deep sense of intimate/universal sacred holiness sitting quietly one dawn; embodied tearful blessed gratitude and communion. I am SO looking forward to your workshop on the 13th!
ReplyDeleteLove and prayers ~ Michael��✨
Hi Michael, Thanks so much for your feedback. I'm touched that the blog touched you in this way. May the deep sense of intimate/universal sacred holiness pervade our lives in every, or at least many moments! Looking forward to being and moving with you at the workshop, too! Blessings,Cherionna
DeleteThe workshop Michael and I were referring to is The Fluid Body: Diving into the Primordial with Continuum Movement in Devon on the 13th of October. To learn more and register online: http://events.r20.constantcontact.com/register/event?oeidk=a07e81laz2kb92c271f
ReplyDelete